Dylan failed because Apple losed interest, if they had Swift like motivation back then, it might have turned out differently.
Julia, lets see how it goes.
Given what I’ve seen in the past 25 years, I’m not sure you’re wrong.
So you need an use case to keep your product on the market (programming language).
Corporations are the ones with deep enough pockets to push those use cases, even if initally they don't caught on.
For example, if Dart was a FOSS project it would have died by now, instead Google can keep throwing money at Flutter until Dart actually picks up.
Yes, there are grass roots marketing that gets some languages adopted. They seem to be the exceptions proving the rule.
So much of the technical chase for getting a successful language feels jarring compared to the momentum of languages that are succeeding.
Dylan failed because Apple losed interest, if they had Swift like motivation back then, it might have turned out differently.
Julia, lets see how it goes.