Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Depends on if those 9s are in series or in parallel. In series it multiplies to produce lower availability but in parallel they give you higher availability.



> AWS will use commercially reasonable efforts to make the Included Services each available for each AWS region with a Monthly Uptime Percentage of at least 99.99%, in each case during any monthly billing cycle....

So to achieve 99.99% within a region, every component should have at least 3 nodes and to better it deployment should go multi-region which will escalate the costs quickly.

Most application in reality don't even need four 9s so this works b beautifully for everyone. I work in outsourcing industry and in bad old days we had huge penalties and many rounds of explanations even for applications with no redundancy requirements ;).

But it's just Amazon credit nowadays and no one blinks and eye so it's win win the all.


3 nodes of a component in parallel would give you 99.9999% for that component.


Yes but not in AWS land. Committed SLA for availability of entire region is still 4 nines irrespective.


Hmmm. That's good to know.

So in that case you have to replicate across three regions to get 6 nines. So one component needs 9 copies running around the world to have 6 nines for the component.


Preety much. As I said above it works because most internal apps within the Enterprise don't even need 2 nines.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: