> It is not kosher for employees of a company to use their corporate position to push what are private political goals.
What's the difference between employees of a company pushing for political change versus company executives using their position and influence to affect politics?
The answer is there is none. A company is founded by people, and people run the company, either as workers, shareholders, or both. In the end, this is a good sign for us regular people. We want change, and the only way to get it is to get political. Either that, or riots.
> What's the difference between employees of a company pushing for political change versus company executives using their position and influence to affect politics?
The executives shouldn't be doing that either. However, the core role of the executive is to decide how to deploy a companies resources. That is a pretty substantial difference.
> We want change ...
'We' is presumably a group of people living in a democratic first world country. We have systems for deciding what 'we' want, and it frequently spits out results that suggest 'we' do not want change.
What's the difference between employees of a company pushing for political change versus company executives using their position and influence to affect politics?
ie, https://time.com/5713537/amazon-seattle-city-council/
The answer is there is none. A company is founded by people, and people run the company, either as workers, shareholders, or both. In the end, this is a good sign for us regular people. We want change, and the only way to get it is to get political. Either that, or riots.