Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The article doesn't even mention the word 'climate', let alone 'climate change'. There are references to last summer being the hottest on record, which is true, or the effects of the drought, but it's not talking about climate change. Get your shit together - you are a perfect example of why the issue is polarized.



If the river always runs dry and the article is not implying anything about climate change, then why does the article exist?


The issue is not related to climate change, but a series of water policies that have favoured farming / agriculture over the environment / community use. In short, too much water being taken upstream.

As an Australian, it baffles me that we're trying to grow cotton and rice in the desert. I personally don't believe that farmers who make poor business decisions should be consistently bailed out by the government. I'd rather we pay for research into drought resistant crops, growing the right produce in the right climates, and failing that, retraining farmers and agri workers into new industries like solar. Lots of sun, not much water.


It doesn't really need to be about climate change - the main issue people are upset about seems to be this:

> At Menindee, 830 km west of Sydney, despair has turned to anger as residents

> blame the government for exacerbating the drought by drawing down river water

> in 2017 for irrigation and other uses downstream.


To complain about and argue for changes in upstream water use.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: