On: California fault capable of producing a magnitude 8 earthquake has begun moving

[dehrmann]

NYC earthquake risk is on-par with the Bay Area because while the magnitude of the quakes would be lower, the bedrocks transmits the energy better, the buildings are under-engineered for earthquakes, and it has a higher population density.

[quotemstr → dehrmann]

NYC is not close to any major geological activity. The east coast, unlike the west coast, has been quiet for, what, 60 million years? The Appalachian mountains are worn-down nubs. The closest seismic zones are, what, the Caribbean and the New Madrid area of Missouri, IIRC.

[Decade → quotemstr]

Depending on how you define “major” (I just saw a Twitter status arguing that San Francisco does not get “truly big” earthquakes because it’s a transform boundary and not a subduction zone), New York has a bunch of faults and does get significant geological activity. https://twitter.com/typesfast/status/1183984933733158913 https://nypost.com/2017/09/09/new-york-city-is-overdue-for-a...