Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Assuming there’s a lack of toxic effects because a human has not yet named any is fallacious. Safety is inherently impossible to demonstrate with certainty.


But they never said that microplastic had "no" toxic effects, just no immediately visible ones.


Just curious, what does “immediately visible” mean?


> I think people around the world have been ingesting microplastic for 30 years or longer, yet there's no reported case of any direct toxic effects. So I guess microplastic doesn't have immediately effects on health

In this case, 30 years? Or, taken in another light, it doesn't have effects that are visible on the time-scale of known substances such as lead, arsenic, mercury, etc.

In addition, the parent also stated this:

> I won't be surprised if future studies find longterm effects, such as increasing the risk of cancer, damage to the circulatory system or the brain.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: