Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Unkillable software also has a very high bar for quality. That means among other things that it needs to be a good citizen on my computer and have pristine quality control. Keystone is neither and never has been. With great power comes great responsibility, and Google blew it.



Plus it's one thing to be difficult for malware to kill and another for it to be impossible to disable for privacy or maintenance reasons.

It's a tradeoff that favours Google and imposed by the unilaterally.

I could think of a few ways this could be addressed without forcing it. Such as detection from the browser app when it's not available.


I mean, I'm going to judge them when I stop writing bugs. Until then, a zealous updater seems preferable to leaving browsers around with CVEs, even with this massive fuck up on their plate.


And yet Firefox found a way to solve that problem without creating malware in the process.


Firefox's updater breaks significantly more than Google's.


It might break more often but it doesn’t break my stuff like Google does.


How often does it break your computer?


I'm saying that for a lot of people, hard breaking their computer might be the better option compared to stop updating CVEs and stealing everything the person owns.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: