Yeah things I would get rid of in c is 'int' and the wishy washy integer type non sense that goes with it. The whole thing was a big pain in the ass until pure 32 bit machines came along and everyone forgot. Now it's a pain in the ass again.
Range types were one of my favourite features of the Ada type system. Such a simple idea, but super effective, and really useful when doing static analysis. Being able to push constraints to the interface simplified a lot of things.
Something like that is what I am hoping we get with contracts when they make it into C++. Although the versions so far only add constraints to functions, having them on types as well sounds very useful.
It's great. It allows you to push the responsibility for checking values are in type right out to the earliest point, reducing the need to sprinkle bounds checking code all over the place. If you are using static analysis like SPARK or one of the others, it then lets you do a load more of it automatically, the constraints it places on values makes it much easier to statically demonstrate runtime properties of the code before.
I'd also add range types ala Ada.