Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
[dead]
on Jan 10, 2011 | hide | past | favorite



This article should have read backwards starting with

"The Briefing Kit had been a premature release of the summary results, before the full research outcomes had gone through the usual thorough review and editing process."

EG - no peer reviewed study exists, this link itself is based on a non-peer edited summary of the actual study.


So what happened to the actual study?


Remember the source:

The Transnational Institute (TNI) of Policy Studies:

carries out radical informed analysis on critical global issues

builds alliances with social movements

develops proposals for a more sustainable, just and democratic world. More



Gah! Why is this relevant to hacker news? You can take this to reddit and have a willing audience.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: