Isn't it a private matter for a woman to decide whether to raise a child or not - regardless of the common good child rearing brings - assuming women raise children is wrong, and sexist too.
There's statutory parental leave to cover pregnancy already.
To mimic your response: men are the ones with the muscles, they are _typically_ stronger therefore we should discriminate.
Seems wrong.
(I'm just returning to my former work as my last child enters institutional schooling, and am male. There's a lot of discrimination here.)
> assuming women raise children is wrong, and sexist too.
I have no need to assume this because this is actually the case. This is reality today. When women stop being the primary ones raising the children then there will no longer be a need to be protections aiding them in finding part time work, but that is for some hypothetical future.
There's statutory parental leave to cover pregnancy already.
To mimic your response: men are the ones with the muscles, they are _typically_ stronger therefore we should discriminate.
Seems wrong.
(I'm just returning to my former work as my last child enters institutional schooling, and am male. There's a lot of discrimination here.)