Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think the point is more that continued copyright protections don't serve any purpose, and thus are unconstitutional.



[deleted]


Let them defend the current policies as promoting, "the progress of science and useful arts..." - as opposed to promoting corporate wealth.

Then let's also define "for limited times..." in terms of decades not centuries.


Right. But a copyright law that doesn't have the purpose and effect of promoting that progress is unconstitutional. Congress can't just hand out intellectual property rights on a whim, nor can they be used to stand in the way of progress.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: