Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login




So what?

Just because someone can afford one doesn't mean it's not clearly a joke that it isn't really the prize for a soft drink competition. The court agreed.


It's a real physical item. Pepsi has lots of money. It is thus reasonable to expect that Pepsi would provide one.

It might be different if Pepsi had offered a flying unicorn, a human slave, psychic powers, a teleporter, a time machine, a genie with 3 wishes, a seat in congress, or a fully operational death star.

The best argument you could make for Pepsi's failure would be that the jet was more restricted at the time. If acquisition hit legal difficulties, the judge should have forced Pepsi to make a substitution of greater cost. It should hurt. For example the Boeing 747 is a real jet that could be purchased freely at the time.


> It's a real physical item. Pepsi has lots of money. It is thus reasonable to expect that Pepsi would provide one.

It was tested in court. They didn't agree this was reasonable. I don't think it would be reasonable either.

Tech people think law is like maths with absolutes - it's not - there's a big test in law of 'come on is that really what a reasonable person would think - use your common sense' and this fails that.


And some of us here disagree the court decision is reasonable.

This isn't "tech thinking in math ways". This is plain and simple ethics: Pepsi purposefully lied to people, by making an offer they didn't intend to honor - and then they weaseled out of it when someone actually took them up on their offer. Offer is IMO completely reasonable, for the reasons 'burfog gives. If Microsoft or Google advertised a contest in which the prize is a Falcon 9, I would consider this a believable offer too, because they can totally afford it, probably just out of margins on the sales increase they'd get for announcing the contest.


> Pepsi purposefully lied to people

How many times a day to you ‘purposefully lie’ to people when telling a joke? Do they all sue you?


Jokes are clearly labeled as such.

Lying to people for your benefit only to later defend yourself with "it was just a joke!" after they take you seriously isn't jesting; it's plain assholery.


[flagged]


If a Polish software developer manages to convince enough Americans then sure it does :).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: