I don't really object to you posting this to HN as it is on-topic, and I can understand that you want to promote your blog. In saying that, posts with unsubstantiated claims ("...most webmasters and bloggers prefer to pay via Paypal") and spelling mistakes ("Namecheap is a great place to buy domani names") aren't really well received by this community.
I was expecting to see a list of registars based on how many domains they handle, but thats not the case. On top of that you dont point either based on what criteria you sort these registars as the top ones. Like brianwillis points, its just a low quality article with biased sorting (i guess its not random that the first registar on your list has an affilate link huh ?)
I agree. I should have set down a criteria for ranking the domain name registrars. And as far as the affiliate link is concerned, it is there becuase it pays well.
However, I will be careful of the content quality henceforth. Thanks for your frank feedback! :)
I don't have a problem when an uses there affiliate link, it is more than welcome for the author to be rewarded.I think it would be better if you informed the users when you use affiliate links, it would definately boost there credibility of your articles.
Hi! Following your appraisal of the post. I have gone on to edit the complete article and made it news-worthy. Please do go through it and let me know.
I don't really object to you posting this to HN as it is on-topic, and I can understand that you want to promote your blog. In saying that, posts with unsubstantiated claims ("...most webmasters and bloggers prefer to pay via Paypal") and spelling mistakes ("Namecheap is a great place to buy domani names") aren't really well received by this community.