Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think there's an important distinction to be made between lying to potential users and lying to friends, family, or business partners.

Morality is ultimately about results. I mean, it would be ok to lie in order to prevent the apocalypse, right?

Lying to users could be justified as a means to an end, if the end is sufficiently worthwhile. Lying to someone close to you has a much greater cost due to its potential to ruin your relationship, create lots of emotional pain, and end up causing a lot of collateral damage.

Things should work out as long as everybody is clear about where the line is: white lies to potential users -- maybe ok; white lies to somebody close to you -- not ok.




> Morality is ultimately about results.

Or it's not. See deontological vs. consequentialist conceptions of morality.


"Nothing in the world—indeed nothing even beyond the world—can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will."

And if you have a good will then you seek good results, so both philosphies end up in the same place, right?


No, not really. The question can be summed up as "do the ends justify the means?".




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: