Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I actually don't mind signing unenforceable contracts.

You don't have to say anything, life can be like a game of poker. If your perception of reality is correct, you gain outsize influence, if it is incorrect (or more specifically "can't gain consensus") then you are poor or are imprisoned or killed. Do you gain a benefit by informing someone else about their perception of reality?

I primarily try to be rich enough to exercise my perception of reality in appeals court, because thats the only place it really matters.




I quit my job, and moved to another state only to be presented with an egregious unenforceable noncompete on my first day of the new job.

Signing it knowing I was in the clear was the best of a couple bad options.


In a lot of situations where a contract like that comes to court, the company will try to convince the judge to simply reduce the scope of the contract to whatever seems reasonable to them - and this can succeed. (Of course if you're in a state where non-competes are blanket illegal, that's different.)


I do the same thing. It's not even necessary to be especially rich in most cases, so long as you took the time to read the relevant statutes and case law in advance. An hour on a search engine is often enough.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: