Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

did that same thing once, and discovered that they had swapped the numbers for the interest rate and the term, so it was specified as a 4 year mortgage at 30% interest. Ouch!

The closing agent told me to just sign it and they'd fix it in an amendment later. Which I flatly refused to do - no f'ing way I'm signing on for $20k/month payments and hoping they fix it real soon now, especially when the fix is printing off one corrected page.




A similar thing happened to me. The paperwork for our most recent home purchase listed both my wife and I as female, even though I'm male! I emailed the lender and CC:ed my wife saying, "Please correct this as I currently identify as male," which gave my wife a chuckle.


> The closing agent told me to just sign it and they'd fix it in an amendment later.

Given the ethics of the mortgage industry, this might not have even been a mistake. They're terrible and they'd have held you to it.


Not a chance. No one would actually pay 30% interest instead of 4% for a house, and there's no way the contract would hold up in court.


>No one would actually pay 30% interest instead of 4% for a house, and there's no way the contract would hold up in court

Who will reimburse me the legal fees?

Lots and lots of people improperly lost their homes due to illegal robo-signing. They could have saved their houses if they had the resources to fight it in court.


Why wouldn't it hold up if you signed it? And after how many years of litigation? And you're going to let the house go into foreclosure?


There are several reasons the contract would be unenforceable. The main reason is that typos and obvious mistakes in a contract just result in the corrected contract applying.

Even if it were totally clear that both parties really intended 30% interest, which would not be the case, most US states have usury laws, 30% is way above the maximum allowed by any state. So the contract is automatically void in most states.

http://www.lendingkarma.com/content/state-usury-laws-legal-i...

Even in states without usury laws, a mortgage at several times the prevailing rate would certainly be considered "unconscionable", making the contract unenforceable.


I’m sure this was probably not a big deal. No bank would issue such a mortgage. The numbers would have been corrected whether you caught it or not. After all, your mortgage is a separate agreement between you and the bank, and not part of the purchase and sale agreement.


I agree that this would have been fine. But at the same time, it also shouldn’t be a big deal to get a contract that says what it’s supposed to before you sign it.


It was on the mortgage docs, which I was signing at the same time as closing, which is quite typical (at least where I live).

I'm 99% sure that it would've been fine... but a 1% chance of a total shitshow is too much when it's so easily avoidable.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: