Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Getting Serious about “Critical Materials” (scientificamerican.com)
27 points by Bender on June 10, 2019 | hide | past | favorite | 3 comments


The US relies on China more than any other country for its critical minerals.[1] I wonder how much this plays (or should play) into the current US-China trade war and all its noisy politics right now.

After China, the US is most dependent on Canada for minerals. Canada can't supply everything (lithium comes to mind) but at least that seems to be an alliance the US has a better chance to preserve.

See page 12 of the linked USGS report in the article: [1] http://prd-wret.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/...


Lithium is available in seawater. We can have as much as we want.

Seawater was also the source of magnesium for the US before China took over that market.


This feels like a MIC protectionist push for mining more than anything. With the massive navy claiming world wide shipping as the defacto world reserve currency is unreliable? Get real.

The number of viable cut off scenarios is vanishingly small - especially if it excludes catasophies that moot the point utterly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: