Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sinclair media owns most local TV stations in the US and uses them to shape public discourse in less-than-ethical ways. I think when local news has gotten as consolidated as it is, it ought to have some kind of obligation to the public, and shouldn't be able to hide behind "it's a private company" to justify bad behavior.

John Oliver did an informative bit on Sinclair: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvtNyOzGogc



Yes, this weather-report manipulation is the tip of the iceberg.

The station managers get frequent directives from corporate management to hype more-or-less fake stories, and suppress other (real) stories, largely for political purposes.

Before the FCC rescinded its balanced-reporting rules this sort of foolishness was contained, at the cost of sometimes requiring airing fringe lunacy. Now fringe lunacy is often the whole story.


Yes - that is why I ended my post with /censorship_apologist - to indicate it was meant to mock common arguments for censorship.

Arguments that are only invoked when the speech being censored is unpopular.


Another candidate for antitrust action?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: