I've consumed more words from RFCs, hacker news, emails and chat this last month or two, than from reading books.
This is a strong reminder as the writing is beautiful.
When we read our writing and world view takes on a small part of what we read. If all we read are fragments designed to communicate without ambiguity to the highly logical them we lose a lot of romance in the world.
Is not about the cat, is about the person that lost the cat, about some children that she tried to help. It is an interesting real life story,with real life problems, for me it showed me some new things, showed me how other people think and react.
Not OP but this is a wonderful essay by Mary Gaitskill, one of the most interesting writers at work today. This is probably my favourite Gaitskill essay, but I am a cat person so I'm biased.
I'm not really a cat person but I enjoyed it anyway (even if it got me in the feels). I am glad it was posted as I doubt I would have ever come across it otherwise.
Is it just me, or is something screwy going on with this post? I feel like I've seen it every day for the past week, with the same comments getting forward-dated each time.
You're probably seeing the effect of the second-chance pool (described at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11662380). But that should only have happened once, so I'm not sure what accounts for the "every day for the past week" part.
> Finally her mother said that if Natalia behaved herself for three months straight, stopped violating curfew and went to school, she could return home. Natalia did it, for the entire three months. The court date was set. It was expected to be a walk-through. Formally, the judge asked Natalia’s mother if she would allow her to return home. And her mother laughed. She laughed and said, 'I would never let that girl come live with me again.' The social worker told me Natalia screamed like an animal. She said she had to be held back by court officers.
This reads like something out of Dostoevsky. I like how simion314 puts it. "It is an interesting real life story, with real life problems, for me it showed me some new things, showed me how other people think and react." This is what is appealing about Dostoevsky too. For example, the following passage was illuminating to me:
> I asked why. I don’t remember what he said. I came away with the impression that my friend found the language I used too corny or therapeutic. And it was. Certainly my father would've found it so. But I don’t think that’s the only reason he walked away. If my language was a cliché, it was also heartfelt and naked. That kind of sudden nakedness, without even a posture of elegance, would've been a kind of violence to my father. It would've touched him forcefully in a place he had spent his life guarding. To say 'yes' would’ve allowed too much of that force in too deeply. Saying 'no' was a way of being faithful to the guarded place.
Don't know if this is the case here, but if a mod notices something interesting and it doesn't gain traction, they will invite the submitter to submit it again at a later date and add a bump to keep it up a little longer to see if it gains traction then.
It's nice that there is some variety of interesting things here so that it's not all tech-related. Most hackers love cats I think.
This is a strong reminder as the writing is beautiful.
When we read our writing and world view takes on a small part of what we read. If all we read are fragments designed to communicate without ambiguity to the highly logical them we lose a lot of romance in the world.
Thank you for posting this on here.