> The old definition of high-level waste was based on how the materials were produced, while the new definition will be based on their radioactive characteristics – the standard used in most countries, the energy department said.
So they moved to a more accurate labeling system with regards to the actual danger posed by the waste, so it can be disposed of more appropriately? How is this a story?
The old definition of high-level waste was based on how the materials were produced, while the new definition will be based on their radioactive characteristics – the standard used in most countries, the energy department said.
The old definition said high-level radioactive waste resulted from a military production stream, Dabbar said. That meant, for instance, that all the waste from plutonium production at Hanford was classified as high level.
It was a “one-size-fits-all approach that has led to decades of delay, cost billions of dollars, and left the waste trapped in DOE facilities in the states of South Carolina, Washington and Idaho without a permanent disposal solution”, the agency said.
So essentially this is low level waste that was classified as high level because it was made for military purposes.
So they moved to a more accurate labeling system with regards to the actual danger posed by the waste, so it can be disposed of more appropriately? How is this a story?