On: An update on last week's customer shutdown incident

[ben0x539]

> The article discusses violating TOS, not a billing issue.

That's not the impression I got. It sounds like the issue was that a account with misinterpreted payment history was showing bitcoin-mining-like usage patterns. Mining is not against the terms of use, they were just erroneously convinced themselves that the customer was not going to pay for it.

[ben0x539 → ben0x539]

I'd like to apologize for the typos in my previous comment that I neglected to notice before the edit window expired.

[bcooks → ben0x539]

Correct.