I find this interesting and somewhat in conflict with my experience.
I've been doing restoration work on an old home in the desert, and many of the nails in wood exposed to the elements had become quite loose and worked their way out enough to just grab and pull the rest of the way out without any tools.
But the nails with with a screw pattern on them which twist as they're hammered in have done much better than the smooth ones. None of these have backed out, and they're all still very firmly set, in the same wood, in the same environment, for the same duration. The builder had used these screw-style nails for hangers, but smooth nails for everything else.
I've been using SS deck screws of various length and gauge to do all my restoration work, in part because the reused wood is so old and brittle it's impossible to put new nails into it without splitting, and based on the screw-nails doing so much better than the smooth ones, I assumed the deck screws would be similarly more lasting.
If what you're saying is accurate, I would have expected the screw-nails to have backed themselves out. But it was the opposite situation.
My interpretation of what happens is the wood swells and contracts from both the temp and moisture changes. The metal fasteners don't change dimension much at all in these relatively insignificant (for metal) temp differences. When the wood swells up the first time, it compresses itself around the firmly held nail, and the nail doesn't budge. When the wood shrinks back down, the compressed wood around the nail stays compressed and now the bore is bigger than before. This cycle repeats itself over the years, and since the nail has a pointy tip, every time the wood swells up and closes in on the nail, it nudges the nail out a little bit before tightening until things shrink again.
Based on this model, I think the screw is superior because the depth of the threads is greater than the dimensional difference between swollen and shrunken. The wood is free to go about its seasonal cycles, and the screw doesn't move because the threads are always engaged enough to resist that little pressing force at the pointy tip.
I'm a noob when it comes to all this, but that's my impression and only time will tell if I've made a horrible mistake using screws for all these joints. Though it's not like I had many options.
I've been doing restoration work on an old home in the desert, and many of the nails in wood exposed to the elements had become quite loose and worked their way out enough to just grab and pull the rest of the way out without any tools.
But the nails with with a screw pattern on them which twist as they're hammered in have done much better than the smooth ones. None of these have backed out, and they're all still very firmly set, in the same wood, in the same environment, for the same duration. The builder had used these screw-style nails for hangers, but smooth nails for everything else.
I've been using SS deck screws of various length and gauge to do all my restoration work, in part because the reused wood is so old and brittle it's impossible to put new nails into it without splitting, and based on the screw-nails doing so much better than the smooth ones, I assumed the deck screws would be similarly more lasting.
If what you're saying is accurate, I would have expected the screw-nails to have backed themselves out. But it was the opposite situation.
My interpretation of what happens is the wood swells and contracts from both the temp and moisture changes. The metal fasteners don't change dimension much at all in these relatively insignificant (for metal) temp differences. When the wood swells up the first time, it compresses itself around the firmly held nail, and the nail doesn't budge. When the wood shrinks back down, the compressed wood around the nail stays compressed and now the bore is bigger than before. This cycle repeats itself over the years, and since the nail has a pointy tip, every time the wood swells up and closes in on the nail, it nudges the nail out a little bit before tightening until things shrink again.
Based on this model, I think the screw is superior because the depth of the threads is greater than the dimensional difference between swollen and shrunken. The wood is free to go about its seasonal cycles, and the screw doesn't move because the threads are always engaged enough to resist that little pressing force at the pointy tip.
I'm a noob when it comes to all this, but that's my impression and only time will tell if I've made a horrible mistake using screws for all these joints. Though it's not like I had many options.