So the upvotes are spread out over a long time, and the ranking algorithm heavily discounts spread-out upvotes.
1) top stories are usually very unique or a good debate
2) if it worked, people would work together to game the system.
I once read a short article by a journal editor, on the theme of contributors describing their work as 'extremely unique'.
Something is either unique or it's not.
If anyone knows the article I'm referring to, I'd appreciate a link, I've been trying to find it again for a year or two.