Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

mutt + imap + gmail = awesome.

There is just something about a simple plain text email interface with the power of an editor that makes life so much easier.




Of course that should be mutt + gmail. One doesn't need to use an IMAP app, mutt has this built in now. It's pretty good.


I have found gmail's IMAP service to be slow (only fetching 100 headers at a time). Perhaps others have had a better experience.


Does that setup handle gmail's concept of labeling? Such as archiving messages?


http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77657 is a nifty little chart showing how to accomplish Gmail actions from within the IMAP client of your choice.

If you delete a message from the inbox, then it gets archived. If you move it to [Gmail]/Spam or [Gmail]/Trash and then delete it, then it will really delete it.


As I understand it, IMAP is bolted on to gmail so labeling is never quite right in any client.


Tangentially, http://sup.rubyforge.org implements a GMail-like interface, full-text search and such but works with (essentially) any source.


I was recently figuring this out. Here is my config: http://bit.ly/fRpcs7


mutt + gmail + offlineimap is even better.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: