On: 100% renewables doesn’t equal zero-carbon energy, and the difference is growing

[bubblewrap]

Yeah I don't believe it is so simple, otherwise, why wouldn't people use it en masse?

You assume the non-edible parts of farmed plants would be sufficient to provide all the energy we need. That seems unlikely to be the case.

Why would it be different than Biofuel, which ended up costing rainforset for planting plants that could be turned into fuel?