I don't see why they would be more of a hassle. Why would they even care if the ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		icebraining on May 25, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Static web – back to the roots? I don't see why they would be more of a hassle. Why would they even care if the HTML is being rendered on demand or pre-rendered and stored? Regarding cache, I don't agree - having your site cached by the edge nodes of a CDN is quite important nowadays.

lazyjones on May 25, 2019 [–]

> Regarding cache, I don't agree - having your site cached by the edge nodes of a CDN is quite important nowadays.

How many of the Alexa top 10K or so have cacheable HTML content (not JS, CSS, images, video) in CDN? Can you provide a few examples?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact