On: Huawei's vulnerability to US microchip ban

[echopom]

>Huawei's microchip vulnerability explained

This article does not explain a single thing about why those chips are vulnerable.

It just enumerate some of the components within it.

Those clikbait titles for ad-revenue are becoming a real issue...

[makomk → echopom]

It's not the chips that are vulnerable - it's Huawei's business that's vulnerable to the US blocking them from obtaining those crucial chips.

[mhandley → makomk]

I've modified the original title to hopefully make this clearer

[some_random → mhandley]

If only you could modify the title on BBC's end.

[dazc → echopom]

'This article does not explain a single thing about why those chips are vulnerable.'

The BBC have a talent of explaining complicated things in a way that actually explains nothing at all.