While I will conceptually agree, that optimizing some things via the government can work better. In practice, however, it often leads to cronyism, corruption, bureaucracy and/or stagnation.
On the flip side, I'm also against certain things being incentivized by the government. I'm against private prisons on pure premise.
In the end, I'm pragmatic and prefer to optimize for those solutions which require the least oversight and ensure for the best competition practical. I'd also like to see an "open body" of course content made more widely available, so that districts and teachers may pull in said content for individualized courses. Educational publishing is about as corrupt as it gets IMHO.
I do think that for most things, there are ways to incentivize appropriate outcome from private businesses and initiatives with the government. This includes more appropriate provisioning and budgeting practices.
On the flip side, I'm also against certain things being incentivized by the government. I'm against private prisons on pure premise.
In the end, I'm pragmatic and prefer to optimize for those solutions which require the least oversight and ensure for the best competition practical. I'd also like to see an "open body" of course content made more widely available, so that districts and teachers may pull in said content for individualized courses. Educational publishing is about as corrupt as it gets IMHO.
I do think that for most things, there are ways to incentivize appropriate outcome from private businesses and initiatives with the government. This includes more appropriate provisioning and budgeting practices.