>No it's called Jail for breaking the law, this isn't an internment camp.
So you'd rather lock people up at huge expense, rather than - I don't know - giving people money and actually helping them? Meanwhile, the Zucks of the world are bulldozing their neighbors homes? Interesting.
>If the white walkers are invading your homelands should I be concerned with the ethics of killing them?
And how exactly are homeless people in anyway analogous to these fictionalized monsters from fantasy literature?
Don't use that tactic of comparing the real world with fantasy literature. You know what I'm talking about, don't use this as a tactic because it's cheap.
IF you want to play that game, replace White walkers with nazis. Problem solved.
All I'm saying that problems can be solved by cutting off the head of the snake. America is taking the path of avoiding this type of solution when places like Singapore have used extreme laws like death penalties to create an amazing city.
Also I called it "jail" but clearly it's also a rehabilitation and education center as I mentioned in the OP. Additionally, SF does give homeless people money. It's not working. They get 550 per month on my dime to buy more drugs. I'd rather pay more for an affective solution.
