Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
Miner49er
on May 15, 2019
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Tech companies and governments sign up to Christch...
What do you mean? I was under the impression that ISIS was extremely censored online, particularly by the companies that signed this. Is that not the case? On the otherhand, I see white supremacist propganda basically daily at this point.
dx87
on May 15, 2019
[–]
A couple of years ago, Cloudflare refused to remove access to ISIS websites, and said it's not the job of ISPs or themselves to police content.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/anonymous-opisis-cloudflare-refuse...
anigbrowl
on May 15, 2019
|
parent
[–]
The policy of one internet infrastructure firm doesn't validate the original claim of ISIS' online activity being 'ignored for well over a decade.'
DuskStar
on May 15, 2019
|
root
|
parent
[–]
It does imply they take it less seriously than stormfront, though.
anigbrowl
on May 16, 2019
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Do you mean Cloudfront? I suppose so, but I don't know enough about the company to reach a firm conclusion.
yjftsjthsd-h
on May 16, 2019
|
root
|
parent
[–]
No, stormfront was a ... racially charged... website that Cloudflare actually did refuse to host.
anigbrowl
on May 16, 2019
|
root
|
parent
[–]
I meant to say Cloudflare, sorry. I know what Stormfront is.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
