Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"normal people who want to learn such things choose to go to school"

That's a load of crap. Normal people who want to learn such things pick up a book and read about it. Only very young people consider "going to school" a viable option. Normal people have jobs, kids, and responsibilities and don't have time to go to school every time they pick up a new interest.



Normal people who want to learn such things pick up a book and read about it.

I would be very surprised to find very many "normal people" who have the drive to learn, say, probability theory or statistics to any reasonable depth by self-study. Of course such people exist, but they are neither typical nor common.


I said normal people who want. Now it's true that normal people don't generally want to learn probability theory, but if they do, they'll turn to books and self teaching long before school unless they're extremely young and still think of school as life.

Once you've been in the real world for a while, the idea of going back to school is generally the last option, not the first. The only thing school has to offer over self directed learning is very smart people to learn from, but if you look around, you can find those people in the real world as well. Mentors tent to show up just when you're sincerely looking for them.


they'll turn to books and self teaching long before school unless they're extremely young and still think of school as life.

On the contrary, many people take classes and attend conferences, workshops and seminars at many different ages. You could learn cooking by self study, but cooking classes continue to be popular, despite being more expensive.

The only thing school has to offer over self directed learning is very smart people to learn from

Hardly the only thing: a lot of things are easier to learn when you're in a group of intelligent people all interested in approximately the same thing, and all trying to learn the same subject matter (I'm thinking mostly of graduate seminar classes here, not 300-student undergrad lectures).


There's a difference between conferences, workshops, etc. and school.


Different venues perhaps, but for someone attending because they want to, the goals are much the same.


I didn't say adults don't go to school, only that it's usually not the first option.

You second point just echo's what I already said, smart people to learn from, that includes your teachers and peers.


Well, you said that "normal people" would read a book "long before" going to school, which I think is not true in many domains.

My second point was not just that you can learn from your peers, but that there is a social environment at a school that is important, and not readily replicated in self-study. You don't learn much from your peers at a typical cooking class, but they still contribute to why many people choose to take classes rather than self-study.


The stats on college attendance would seem to be against you since about 70% of the population doesn't do it or doesn't finish a 4 year degree. Those are normal people. The 30% that do attend college and finish with at least a Bachelor's are the minority.

Yes, school is a social environment for learning, that has value, but it's hardly the only way to obtain that. Outside of school, there are local clubs and hobbie groups, forums and blogs such as this on the Internet, alternate paths such as the military, etc. There are all kinds of ways to be around people who enjoy the same things you do, or are trying to learn the same things you are without going to school.

By saying thats a benefit of school you're implying that it's not obtainable elsewhere. School just isn't that important if you really want to learn, it's more valuable for those that lack motivation and need someone to make them learn.


The stats on college attendance would seem to be against you since about 70% of the population doesn't do it...

In what country? Citation?

Here's some numbers from the UK: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/faqs/showFaq.asp?l1=2&ID...

According to that, 43% of 17-30 year olds enter higher education in the UK.


My apologies for the U.S. cultural assumption. See http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p20-550.pdf for what it's like here. I also presumed we're discussing those who finish college, not those who just enter it. What percentage actually finish college in the UK?


The OECD stats look quite interesting. They break things down into Type A[1] and Type B[2] programs. Superficially, Type A are 3+ year courses, Type B are 2+ year courses. Results for the UK and US are here[3][xls]. Executive summary: for the 3-4 year Type A graduates, in the UK, 97% graduate. The OECD average is 67%. This report also has data for the US.

For actual numbers of people in the UK with degrees, there's this page[4] from the National Statistics. For people of Working Age, 18 to 60-ish, in the UK, 16% have degrees, and another 8.5% have "Higher education qualifications". 15% have no qualifications. It would be handy to have data for the 25-35 age range, since not many 18 year olds have degrees.

[1] Type A: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=5440

[2] Type B: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=544

[3] World Stats: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/15/39245059.xls

[4] UK Degree Stats: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/Product.asp?vlnk=10446


The original poster was asking why startups use this practice. Startups should not be looking for normal people at all.


Thank you, now I feel special ;P


Normal is not easily defined. Average is. you are confusing the average person with the average hacker. which most likely the average type of person in your circle of acquaintences.

I have suggested self-teaching to many non-hacker types and they are completely opposed to it. Even those going into programming.


I was talking about college-age people, as in to enter college when you're 18 or get a job and hope to become an autodidact.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: