> It glosses over a lot of things, like what motivates a person and how we define "good".
My interpretation is that the goal is to try to avoid the queston of Zuckerberg's moral character. Do some people think he's evil? Yes. Is that relevant as a matter of public policy? Perhaps not. It's a matter for personal judgments and personal opinion.
The question at hand is Facebook, not Zuckerberg's soul. For most readers, this helps them focus appropriately.
My interpretation is that the goal is to try to avoid the queston of Zuckerberg's moral character. Do some people think he's evil? Yes. Is that relevant as a matter of public policy? Perhaps not. It's a matter for personal judgments and personal opinion.
The question at hand is Facebook, not Zuckerberg's soul. For most readers, this helps them focus appropriately.