Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Generally, but I think that's a bit of a "hey people without a lot of money who can't afford more... you should save money" there.

Not that they shouldn't do it, but a slight paradox there.



The point was that the premium was lower so you could save the difference and instead of that difference going to waste each year, it could compound over time.


HSAs aren't use it or lose it. That's FSAs.


I mean, if a HDHP plan costs 400 / mo and a regular plan costs 1000 / mo, you get to save the 600 and let that compound over many years (if you don't use it), rather than lose the 600 in insurance premiums.


tathougies was referring to the difference in monthly health insurance premiums. I don't see what their comment has to do with Flexible Savings Accounts.


I think I may have responded to the wrong comment here. Someone else was saying that HSAs are use-it-or-lose-it.


yup!


From what I understand, even the HDHPs have such high premiums that the point is not being achieved, especially if you have to go through the marketplace rather than the employer.


Due to rising healthcare costs, and employers reducing the portion of health insurance premiums that they want to pay for their employee (aka a paycut), that's going to be true regardless of HDHP or not HDHP.


HSA is spend it or lose it.


You're mistaken, but it's an easy mistake to make.

There's an alphabet soup of FSA/LPFSA/HSA/DCFSA options.

An HSA is truly your own savings account, owned by you (just like any other savings account), regardless of where contributions come from.


Nonono.

That's an FSA. You can hold on to your HSA indefinitely and withdraw for medical reimbursement at any time (decades later).


Actually, that would an FSA. You can hold onto HSAs.


You’re thinking of FSAs




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: