While I agree with the sentiment and most that’s being said in this article, it’s exactly that: most of it has already been said and discussed on HN, and I don’t feel like it adds anything new.
Besides that, Uber is hardly the first nor will it be the last moral stain of the valley.
Ideological and ad hominem arguments don't help me understand your thinking. Are there specific facts or reasoning you disagree with that transcend the author or ideology?
nope. uber is the only problematic corporation here.