Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Europe is irrelevant. By 2050 it's estimated that Europe will only account for 9% of the global GDP [1]. Down from 15% today. China will account for 20% of the GDP and India 15% by 2050.

I can not understand the Hacker News focus on European law given its declining prospects.

1. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/economy/the-world-in-2050.h...




> Europe is irrelevant.

15% of global GDP today, as you say, and considered the best place in the world to live by most measure.

> I can not understand the Hacker News focus on European law given its declining prospects. Europe is irrelevant.

I'd wager that a large percentage of users of this forum who are not from the US are from Europe.


Meh. My money is in emerging markets. Not European malaise. Maybe its a great place to retire - but it certainly isn't leading the world in technology output. Where is your Amazon? Where is your Alibaba?

It does not exist.


Where is your good quality food, vacation days, leaving-work-at-five-o'clock, unlimited sick leave, parental leave, social mobility, and happiness and life satisfaction?

"For me, Europe is more than just a single market. More than money, more than the euro. It was always about values." — President Jean-Claude Juncker, 2017 State of the Union Address.


The tiger which is chewing on my leg today will be dead in 20 years, so why should I worry about it?

The EU is the world's second largest economy in both straight GDP and GDP PPP. What it does today impacts the global marketplace. That is the point of the issue here.

Also your reasoning is flawed. Look at how tech companies bend over backwards to please Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc. Any large marketplace has an inertia of its own, and companies will always be willing to sell out their principles in order to ensure they lead in any decent-sized marketplace.


> "The tiger which is chewing on my leg today will be dead in 20 years, so why should I worry about it"

what does this expression mean?


It means that just because something may diminish with time does not mean it is not important today.


By that definition any country that is not china or india become less relevant. But the thing you're wrong about is that a relative decline does not automatically result in an absolute decline.


How is GDP relevant to relevance of Europe?


It's relevant to investment. If I'm building a company, American Law, Chinese law, or Indian law is more important to me than European law.

Simply because there is more opportunity to be had.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: