Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's effective just like taking a hammer to your computer is when there is a bug in your code. You can't have a bug if you don't have a working computer.



Obviously, you're being sarcastic, but....

One of more credible theories about depression is that it occurs when the brain gets stuck in a "bad" state or cycle (like a local minimum or attracting state). If this model is correct, a treatment that nudges brain activity away from the depressed state and towards a less pathological one would help.

It's more akin to rebooting the computer than smashing it, if you will.


The other credible theory is that by damaging your brain cells, they can no longer fire in ways that regulate your mood towards depression.


Got some references for that?

I ask because ECT seems to upregulate trophic factors, rather than downregulating them. Some sort of hippocampal injury does seem like it could explain memory-related side effects, but it apparently doesn't actually happen (e.g., https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/...)


Nature, for one:

"ECT damage is easy to find if you look for it" https://www.nature.com/articles/35002188


That’s an unreviewed letter to the editor, not an actual research report.

Look, I’m not arguing that ECT is the best thing ever. The side effects are awful for some people, no one understands the mechanism, and so on. However, it sometimes works when other treatments—-which aren’t great either—-fail. Clearly, better therapies are needed all around.


That's a faulty analogy and unsupported by anything outside of popular culture. Nothing in the scientific literature supports this conclusion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: