Quick summary: the inclusion of conservative figure Kay Coles James provoked a major controversy due to her record of suggesting transgender women should be held to the standards/expectations of men, and downplaying the urgency of climate change.
I dunno what to feel about this, really. This idea almost looked DOA since an ethics panel with a strong mandate would ideally include a wide variety of perspectives, including hotly controversial ones. Yet at the same time, you know Google would never stock it with a white nationalist, so I'm not sure it's that much better stocking it with someone who denies the validity of transgender people.
I dunno what to feel about this, really. This idea almost looked DOA since an ethics panel with a strong mandate would ideally include a wide variety of perspectives, including hotly controversial ones. Yet at the same time, you know Google would never stock it with a white nationalist, so I'm not sure it's that much better stocking it with someone who denies the validity of transgender people.