> Make the tenants whole through at least April, if not April and May.
Are you saying that organizations that just happen to be in the same general business should be covering for the fraud of unrelated companies? Should Stanford be paying back the students of Belford University?
It depends whether your industry wants to have a good reputation or not. If you're OK with all being seen as scum who try to get whatever they can, I guess not.
Suppose an airline collapses, leaving passengers stranded. Better run airlines _could_ say "Sucks to be you, choose a better airline next time" and charge full fare to anybody stranded trying to get home. But actually they mostly don't do that, usually "rescue" fares will be offered at a steep discount to secure good will. A customer who has a now worthless $500 ticket often finds that a rival company will swap that plus $50 for a ticket home on their plane.
Actually, that exact scenario just happened with Wow! Air (Iceland discount airline)... while rival airlines have advertised so-called 'rescue fares', actually obtaining them is another story all together (at least judging from the comments on TPG[0])
Are you saying that organizations that just happen to be in the same general business should be covering for the fraud of unrelated companies? Should Stanford be paying back the students of Belford University?