> if implemented correctly, maybe, but that rarely happens.
It's OT, but isn't it funny that we think that by applying in the exactly correct way a method that, to my knowledge, wasn't born from fundamental principles or hard science, you should get all the results you don't get when taking some liberties with it?
I mean, where does the assurance that the method works better than any variation of it come from?
It's OT, but isn't it funny that we think that by applying in the exactly correct way a method that, to my knowledge, wasn't born from fundamental principles or hard science, you should get all the results you don't get when taking some liberties with it?
I mean, where does the assurance that the method works better than any variation of it come from?