Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So why do we allow companies who allow gross malfeasance to get off easy by bankruptcy, get rid of all their debts of all kinds, and then continue as normal?


I think you may be underestimating bankruptcy's difficulty.


I don't think the equity holders call it getting off easy when they lost over 50% of their value in their investment.


Boohoo, a bunch of rich people lose a small percent of their diversified wealth. Frankly, I'm not concerned about that at all.

What about all the homes and businesses and people who died and were injured? What about all the land, and crops, and trees? What about air quality and harm done to all the peoples' lungs being in that? Usually how bankruptcy courts work, those are considered "unsecured debts". They're handled below everything else, and usually not paid at all. And that's why PG&E is doing this, to dump them.

As a person (and not a figment of my imagination corporation), I can't declare bankruptcy for student loans, even though they're eating me alive. Not available. And that's for dubious "classes" of various quality at the local university. Yet if a company kills people, or has malfeasance that leads to their deaths, its cool... Just declare chapter 11 and rid yourselves of "dead weight".


Not only "rich people" have stocks. I for one lost a few thousand with that drop.

Global warming is an issue at play even though it is always easier to point the finger "at the evil [X] corporation"


I think it is closer to 80% from the 2017 high and 75% from 2018-Q3.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: