Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Youtube has made significant efforts to not show ads on content that is deemed unsafe, so those videos generally aren't making any money.

You seem to be against people putting out content that don't align with your views, which is something completely different.



> You seem to be against people putting out content that don't align with your views

Not GP, but I see this a lot as a retort to people who make the claims they did and I tend to call BS on it.

I strongly suspect there is an extremely broad library of "content that doesn't align with their views", including an extremely broad spectrum of political views, they would have zero issues with on YouTube.

Somehow, climate denialism, antivax content (and other health hazards), holocaust denial, general nazi shit etc are consistently not part of that.

Now GP can come in, correct me and tell me that they want everything they ever would disagree with off Youtube for good. But somehow, I suspect they won't.

So, tangential to your post but, tell me: why is it that there's such a consistently-easy-to-define line for content that a lot of people think should be kept off various platforms, and why the hell is it that, whenever I see someone defending such content, it's almost always someone who belongs in the category of people who believe in said content, rather than a staunch defender of free speech.

I ask this knowing full well there are many people I hold in very high esteem, who legitimately do defend extremely vile shit they disagree with, based on free speech principles. Most of those people I personally know work at the EFF and I've never heard them say much about deplatforming nazis. (could it be because free speech is a government thing, not a youtube thing …)


> why the hell is it that, whenever I see someone defending such content, it's almost always someone who belongs in the category of people who believe in said content

Since nobody here has given any indication that they believe in these ideas, it's probably because you simply assume that anyone defending it believes in it.

Possibly also because the concept of not wanting to take down objectionable videos is a "weird" idea, and people who are willing to take weird ideas seriously probably have lots of other weird ideas.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: