Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How many apps require web storage? Are there sufficient requirements to implement web workers or service workers?

Go back to the core design and simplify it. Keep what you need and everything else is noise.

My point was people pick the new and coming framework and it turns into tech debt. If development was more requirement driven, we wouldn’t be in this mess.



To come back to the OP: "Why does front-end development change so often?"

I think a lot of technology that was solely available to the backend for a long time is now possible to do in the frontend (including machine learning with Tensorflow) ...it's a quite new and limited (but save) form, but the advantages in using those capabilities are clear to me.

As everything is quite young there isn't an established pattern yet and a lot of active research is happening. Just in the last 5 years alone we got quite an amount of additional languages: Elm, TypeScript, Flow, ReasonML, PureScript. I personally like the functional approach of React to transform the interaction of the imperative DOM to a declarative one, but there is still a lot to be done until we reach something like an MV* pattern for SPAs. If I were to make a guess, I would guess that all the active change in the frontend (including the urge for WebAssembly from some) is truly because of the hope for an MV* pattern that combines all those technologies with the advantages of the web.

If you were to take on some tech dept, please make sure to keep it interesting for the future development. The essence of the web is to not find a common agreement, and I think the active development on the frontend mirrors this sentiment quite well. ;)


> How many apps require web storage? Are there sufficient requirements to implement web workers or service workers?

Most B2B apps and apps with monthly subscriptions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: