>If conditions are met, and all bondholders convert, Tesla would suddenly gain $920 million worth of much-needed financial flexibility. To spark a conversion, Tesla needs to boost its stock price to $359.87 or higher at some point in the three-month period between Dec. 1 and Feb. 28. The higher the price goes, the more likely holders will convert.
Funny, the strike price ($359.87) is already below the current stock price (360.47)
>(Under the bond agreement, Tesla can choose to pay the bonds off in cash, rather than exchange debt for stock. But given its cash needs, that’s highly unlikely.)
Elon already said he intends to paid back the debt with cash rather than convert. They confirmed on the last earning call that they plan to pay back all debt with cash flow, and ramp up to 500K Model 3 per year with minimal spending (i.e no more cap raise).
If this happens – while the competitors start facing troubles switching to electric, with plummeting profit margins, their market cap will reach a point where they can buy out a competitor. I bet they'd start by acquiring Panasonic cell manufacturing activities though, to further accelerate their tech lead. Remember that they own 60+% of global car battery production today, and their share continues to rise as they ramp up Model 3 (only 1/3 of the 1rst Gigafactory capacity is built yet, and the Shanghai plant is already under construction). Now, wait for the production of Model Y, the Semi and their upcoming Megapowerpack…
Tesla's market cap has surpassed BMW and Daimler in the past two weeks. Someday, Wall Street will recognize that Tesla is the first (and only?) company to have crossed the chasm to all-electric, and maybe even realize that Tesla owns a big part of the renewable energy business thanks to multiyear technological advance and multi-industry economies of scale.
> Funny, the strike price ($359.87) is already below the current stock price (360.47)
Not any more (as of 1:15pm EST) the stock price is $357.30. either way the exact minute to minute price now doesn't particularly matter because we're outside the window.
> Tesla reported a $312 million profit for the three months that ended Sept. 30, thanks to a surge in production and sales of its Model 3 sedan. The company has long promised that the model would help make electric vehicles and Tesla itself a mass-market phenomenon.
> Tesla ended September with $3 billion in cash compared with $2.2 billion at the end of the previous quarter. The company generated $881 million in free cash flow — cash produced through operations less capital expenditures. “The cash-flow number is impressive,” said David Whiston, an auto analyst at Morningstar. “That’s a lot of cash for a company their size.”
Disclaimer: I own a Tesla and a chunk of TSLA stock.
80k cars x 45k avg price is around $3.2 Billion cash coming in a quater. Usually they get 2-3 months credit from suppliers. So unless Tesla spends $2-3 billion at once or the demand for its cars drops dramatically the crash crunch is unlikely to come. Tesla is selling each car at a profit so unlike tech unicorns more sales doesn't mean bigger loss.
It's best to review Musk's goals over the longest term possible, because who cares about being late for a few of the objectives if they are widely exceeded soon after the deadline?
I invite you to re-read the early presentations for the Model S and Gigafactory. Question: of the goals that have been achieved and those who haven't, which are the most important? And for the less important, are these delays interfering with Tesla's mission or just a temporary postponement to further focus on things that matter (e.g displacing oil and disrupting fossil fuel investment plans)?
"Outstanding shares" in the definition of earnings per share et al only count shares held by shareholders, not shares held in the treasury. So it is dilution whether the shares came from a reserve or new issuance.
In fact, I can't say anything on this because they don't even let me read their privacy policy. They've simply blocked all European visitors since last May (!).
I agree it's a good practice, and one not unrelated to how NPR is one of the few news orgs with a good API [0]. Tribune Media, meanwhile, has had a different saga since 2005 to put it lightly, and it includes the industry's most epic failed mergers and reorgs [1]. I'm not privy to their internal development process, but I'm willing to bet that their lack of a GDPR site is much more about being unable to do so due to corporate/financial chaos, and less so because of a purported hatred toward "people's basic rights to privacy".
NPR is a national news source. Thr LA times is just a local paper, one of about a half dozen the Tribune owns. I do not think they ever aspired to have a global prescence, much less actively serve the EU market.
Whats wrong with a local press deciding to stay local, and only comply with local laws?
Countries/Unions are free to make new regulatory laws. It doesn't mean everyone will, or necessarily should, play along. I don't have a problem with companies changing where they decide to do business based on new laws that pop up. Maybe the EU just isn't a large enough part of LA Times revenue to justify the cost of implementing GDPR. Regardless of the reason, it's their choice, just like it's the EU's choice to pass the regulations. What's the issue?
Funny, the strike price ($359.87) is already below the current stock price (360.47)
>(Under the bond agreement, Tesla can choose to pay the bonds off in cash, rather than exchange debt for stock. But given its cash needs, that’s highly unlikely.)
Elon already said he intends to paid back the debt with cash rather than convert. They confirmed on the last earning call that they plan to pay back all debt with cash flow, and ramp up to 500K Model 3 per year with minimal spending (i.e no more cap raise).
If this happens – while the competitors start facing troubles switching to electric, with plummeting profit margins, their market cap will reach a point where they can buy out a competitor. I bet they'd start by acquiring Panasonic cell manufacturing activities though, to further accelerate their tech lead. Remember that they own 60+% of global car battery production today, and their share continues to rise as they ramp up Model 3 (only 1/3 of the 1rst Gigafactory capacity is built yet, and the Shanghai plant is already under construction). Now, wait for the production of Model Y, the Semi and their upcoming Megapowerpack…
Tesla's market cap has surpassed BMW and Daimler in the past two weeks. Someday, Wall Street will recognize that Tesla is the first (and only?) company to have crossed the chasm to all-electric, and maybe even realize that Tesla owns a big part of the renewable energy business thanks to multiyear technological advance and multi-industry economies of scale.