Yeah I screwed that up, what I meant to refer to is this:
>It is not contradictory however, to say that the worst-case
>running time of insertion sort is [Big Omega](n^2),
>since there exists an input that causes the algorithm
>to take [Big Omega](n^2) time.
>Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd Edition, p 46
lower bound like you are talking about (the function always takes longer than this to run for an input of size n)
lower bound across all inputs of size n (the function never runs faster than this, given any possible input of size n)
The two are different