Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You are right. The article is a muddle.

I think they meant: the quadratic lower bound is the highest yet proved -- not that it is "better" than Knuth's unproved conjecture.




It's more likely that the person who wrote this article doesn't even know what a lower bound is.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: