DOI 10.1145/2957276.2957300 is an attempt at using binary-tree variants to improve CRDT's searching performance bottleneck in converting external index position to internal object identifiers. We address these specific complexities in Section 4.2.1.
DOI 10.1145/2957276.2957300 doesn't deal with operation compression. If you believe it does, please point out where we might find it.
It is trivial state opinions like 'OT is complex', but much harder work to back it up with concrete evidence. I'd think folks will find the discussion more informative without the constant hand-waving.
Have you submitted the paper to a peer-reviewed venue? I've read the arXiv version already, and I'd be more than happy to volunteer reviewing it if that's not too late.
It appears you have specific comments and/or feedback? Either post them on HN or send them to the primary contact's email. Either way, we'll make an earnest effort to respond.
This discussion is of interest to folks both inside and outside of academia and the developer community brings valuable hands-on experiences to the table. So, let's keep it inclusive.
Let me prioritize the usual academic processes first to make sure the outcomes are more persistent and visible, given we are talking about a publication under review or a draft. I will reach out to the paper's primary contact.
DOI 10.1145/2957276.2957300 doesn't deal with operation compression. If you believe it does, please point out where we might find it.
It is trivial state opinions like 'OT is complex', but much harder work to back it up with concrete evidence. I'd think folks will find the discussion more informative without the constant hand-waving.