Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Be careful of your use of the term “which hunt.” It explicitly refers to ”made-up allegations.” If it happened, it’s not a witch hunt.


I tried to watch this closely.

I'm aware that some parts where planned carefully to increase the chances of him getting approved.

But still there are massive holes in the attacks against him. So big that even if is Trumps favourite candidate (and therefore I have reason to dislike him) it still ends up with nothing except what seems to be baseless accusations.

It cannot be like this, that someone can come out of nowhere 30 years later without a single piece of evidence - except a testimony from a peeson who is clearly trying to hurt him - and we are supposed to believe it.

And as it turns out they cannot prove the thing they originally accused him for - then immediately they try to "prove" he is a witch in two other ways:

- he drank too much back in the days

- he was angry when he defended himself

I say witch hunt is a good word.

He was declared a witch by certain people and from there on the only thing that mattered was to pin him for something.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: