What are they? Because making a forced bugfix reporting system seems like pointless busywork if the public can't have access to it (and to be honest, it sounds pointless even if they do).
Im open to discussion, but I fail to see how any of this would benefit the user in any way.
The first 2 are basically unenforceable, and depending on the definition would happen so often as to make it easier to hide real issues, or would only happen when a public disclosure should happen, like user data was compromised. (I say "should" because I'm not sure if it's required in the US right now, and if it's not I absolutely think it should be).
The last one makes this situation worse, as now the incentive to correctly fix it is gone. Who cares if further issues with the fix are found? Their liability is limited, so they can half-ass whatever fix they want and be safe. Not to mention that it basically requires the federal agency to have full access to the source and development of all (I'm assuming publicly traded) companies code. Even if I trusted the agency with that information, now it's another target for attackers, and it still doesn't do anything to make code safer for the user.
I understand those were just discussion points or suggestions you are putting out there, and I get that you don't claim to have all the answers at this point, but I genuinely don't see any way that this can help the user in any way at all.
Edit: immediately after posting this I had a thought from re-reading your comments. I'd be open to an "OSHA for programming". An agency or group which creates guidelines or rules you must follow to safely handle data in companies. However I think we would need to be VERY careful to not enforce specific ways of working or specific algorithms to avoid a cryotographic monoculture or codify exploits into the law. And it would need to target only practices which are grossly negligent to avoid being a "shutdown any company at any time" button.
I'm honestly not sure it's possible to make a group like that and ensure it doesn't get out of control, or become so toothless it's just a waste of money. But if that's what you were trying to say, I can see the merit in the idea, but I still don't think it's a good idea.
Has anybody actually proposed this? There are a lot of options between staying silent and public disclosure.