Sure it seems plausible, but from "plausible" to "scientifically" there is IMHO a huge leap.
It may make sense, and personally I hope/wish that it actually works as intended, but that's far from being OK with the font to be tagged as it is.
Even the paper mentioned in the article you linked to that should be this one (the original link in the article is to SAGE journals and I cannot access it):
It may make sense, and personally I hope/wish that it actually works as intended, but that's far from being OK with the font to be tagged as it is.
Even the paper mentioned in the article you linked to that should be this one (the original link in the article is to SAGE journals and I cannot access it):
https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Teaching/papers/Mu...
seems like proposing a theory that makes a lot of sense more than anything else.