> Since angels generally don't take board seats, they don't have this constraint. They're happy to buy only a few percent of you. And although the super-angels are in most respects mini VC funds, they've retained this critical property of angels. They don't take board seats, so they don't need a big percentage of your company.
Though that means you'll get correspondingly less attention from them, it's good news in other respects.
Do many founders consider the additional attention given and influence wielded by VCs as an advantage of taking funding from them?
Though that means you'll get correspondingly less attention from them, it's good news in other respects.
Do many founders consider the additional attention given and influence wielded by VCs as an advantage of taking funding from them?